Sunday, June 15, 2025

What If the Huge Bang Wasn’t the Starting? Analysis Suggests It Could Have Taken Place Inside a Black Gap


The Huge Bang is commonly described because the explosive delivery of the universe—a singular second when area, time, and matter sprang into existence. However what if this was not the start in any respect? What if our universe emerged from one thing else—one thing extra acquainted and radical on the similar time?

In a brand new paper, revealed in Bodily Evaluate D (full preprint right here), my colleagues and I suggest a hanging various. Our calculations counsel the Huge Bang was not the beginning of the whole lot, however fairly the result of a gravitational crunch or collapse that fashioned a really huge black gap—adopted by a bounce inside it.

This concept, which we name the black gap universe, provides a radically completely different view of cosmic origins, but it’s grounded completely in identified physics and observations.

In the present day’s commonplace cosmological mannequin, primarily based on the Huge Bang and cosmic inflation (the concept that the early universe quickly blew up in measurement), has been remarkably profitable in explaining the construction and evolution of the universe. Nevertheless it comes at a value: It leaves a few of the most basic questions unanswered.

For one, the Huge Bang mannequin begins with a singularity—a degree of infinite density the place the legal guidelines of physics break down. This isn’t only a technical glitch; it’s a deep theoretical downside that means we don’t actually perceive the start in any respect.

To clarify the universe’s large-scale construction, physicists launched a short part of fast enlargement into the early universe known as cosmic inflation, powered by an unknown subject with unusual properties. Later, to elucidate the accelerating enlargement noticed at this time, they added one other “mysterious” element: darkish vitality.

In brief, the usual mannequin of cosmology works properly—however solely by introducing new substances now we have by no means noticed instantly. In the meantime, essentially the most fundamental questions stay open: The place did the whole lot come from? Why did it start this manner? And why is the universe so flat, easy, and enormous?

New Mannequin

Our new mannequin tackles these questions from a distinct angle—by wanting inward as a substitute of outward. As an alternative of beginning with an increasing universe and making an attempt to hint again the way it started, we think about what occurs when an excessively dense assortment of matter collapses underneath gravity.

This can be a acquainted course of: Stars collapse into black holes, that are among the many most well-understood objects in physics. However what occurs inside a black gap, past the occasion horizon from which nothing can escape, stays a thriller.

In 1965, the British physicist Roger Penrose proved that underneath very common situations, gravitational collapse should result in a singularity. This outcome, prolonged by the late British physicist Stephen Hawking and others, underpins the concept that singularities—just like the one on the Huge Bang—are unavoidable.

The concept helped win Penrose a share of the 2020 Nobel prize in physics and impressed Hawking’s international bestseller A Temporary Historical past of Time: From the Huge Bang to Black Holes. However there’s a caveat. These “singularity theorems” depend on “classical physics” which describes bizarre macroscopic objects. If we embody the results of quantum mechanics, which guidelines the tiny microcosmos of atoms and particles, as we should at excessive densities, the story could change.

In our new paper, we present that gravitational collapse doesn’t have to finish in a singularity. We discover a precise analytical resolution—a mathematical outcome with no approximations. Our math reveals that as we strategy the potential singularity, the scale of the universe adjustments as a (hyperbolic) operate of cosmic time.

This straightforward mathematical resolution describes how a collapsing cloud of matter can attain a high-density state after which bounce, rebounding outward into a brand new increasing part.

However why do Penrose’s theorems forbid such outcomes? It’s all all the way down to a rule known as the quantum exclusion precept, which states that no two an identical particles generally known as fermions can occupy the identical quantum state (equivalent to angular momentum, or “spin”).

And we present that this rule prevents the particles within the collapsing matter from being squeezed indefinitely. Because of this, the collapse halts and reverses. The bounce is just not solely potential—it’s inevitable underneath the proper situations.

Crucially, this bounce happens completely throughout the framework of common relativity, which applies on massive scales equivalent to stars and galaxies, mixed with the essential ideas of quantum mechanics—no unique fields, further dimensions, or speculative physics required.

What emerges on the opposite facet of the bounce is a universe remarkably like our personal. Much more surprisingly, the rebound naturally produces the 2 separate phases of accelerated enlargement—inflation and darkish vitality—pushed not by hypothetical fields however by the physics of the bounce itself.

Testable Predictions

One of many strengths of this mannequin is that it makes testable predictions. It predicts a small however non-zero quantity of constructive spatial curvature—that means the universe is just not precisely flat, however barely curved, just like the floor of the Earth.

That is merely a relic of the preliminary small over-density that triggered the collapse. If future observations, equivalent to the continued Euclid mission, affirm a small constructive curvature, it might be a robust trace that our universe did certainly emerge from such a bounce. It additionally makes predictions concerning the present universe’s price of enlargement, one thing that has already been verified.

The SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket carrying ESA’s Euclid mission on the launch pad in 2023. Picture Credit score: ESA, CC BY-SA

This mannequin does greater than repair technical issues with commonplace cosmology. It may additionally shed new mild on different deep mysteries in our understanding of the early universe—such because the origin of supermassive black holes, the character of darkish matter, or the hierarchical formation and evolution of galaxies.

These questions will likely be explored by future area missions equivalent to Arrakihs, which is able to examine diffuse options equivalent to stellar halos (a spherical construction of stars and globular clusters surrounding galaxies) and satellite tv for pc galaxies (smaller galaxies that orbit bigger ones) which can be tough to detect with conventional telescopes from Earth and can assist us perceive darkish matter and galaxy evolution.

These phenomena may additionally be linked to relic compact objects—equivalent to black holes—that fashioned in the course of the collapsing part and survived the bounce.

The black gap universe additionally provides a brand new perspective on our place within the cosmos. On this framework, our total observable universe lies inside the inside of a black gap fashioned in some bigger “mother or father” universe.

We aren’t particular, not more than Earth was within the geocentric worldview that led Galileo (the astronomer who recommended the Earth revolves across the solar within the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries) to be positioned underneath home arrest.

We aren’t witnessing the delivery of the whole lot from nothing, however fairly the continuation of a cosmic cycle—one formed by gravity, quantum mechanics, and the deep interconnections between them.

This text is republished from The Dialog underneath a Artistic Commons license. Learn the unique article.

Related Articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Articles

PHP Code Snippets Powered By : XYZScripts.com