SQL. You possibly can construct fashions in your sleep. You’ve run dozens of A/B exams. So why aren’t you getting promoted?
The reality is, most knowledge scientists plateau not as a result of they lack technical expertise, however as a result of they don’t perceive what truly adjustments between ranges. Firms hand you a ladder with obscure rungs labeled “affect,” “scope,” and “strategic pondering” after which count on you to determine what these phrases imply in follow.
Many good and expert knowledge scientists get caught at L4 for years, grinding on tougher technical issues, whereas their friends leap to L5 by shifting how they consider their work. The profession ladder in knowledge science isn’t a straight line of accumulating extra instruments and methods. It’s a sequence of basic shifts in the way you outline issues, create worth, and affect selections. Every promotion requires you to play a special sport and it isn’t at all times clear precisely when the foundations have modified.
On this submit, I’ll break down what adjustments at L3, L4, L5, and L6; not by way of summary competencies, however in concrete behaviors and mindset shifts. These are the patterns I’ve noticed throughout dozens of promotions (and seemingly high-performing however stagnant careers) at main tech firms. Let’s decode the hidden ladder collectively.
L3 → L4: Turning into Dependable
The soar from L3 to L4 is deceptively easy to explain however surprisingly onerous to execute: you will need to shift from being an executor to being an proprietor.
At L3, you’re given well-defined duties. A PM or senior knowledge scientist scopes the work, breaks it into steps, and checks in steadily. You write the SQL question. You construct the dashboard. You run the experiment. Another person worries about whether or not you’re fixing the fitting drawback, whether or not the metric is sensible, or what occurs after you ship.
At L4, you personal the end result. The distinction exhibits up in dozens of small behaviors that compound into a totally completely different working type.
Ending cleanly turns into non-negotiable. L3s can get away with “I constructed the mannequin, right here’s the pocket book.” L4s ship: documentation that others can use, code that passes overview on the primary attempt, outcomes introduced in a approach that results in clear selections. If you hand off work, nothing comes again to you with “wait, what does this column imply?” or “are you able to rerun this with the corrected knowledge?”
Constructing belief means your supervisor stops checking your work. They know that whenever you say the evaluation is finished, it’s truly accomplished: edge instances dealt with, knowledge high quality verified, outcomes sanity-checked in opposition to instinct. Early-career knowledge scientists usually underestimate how a lot of L4 is solely proving you received’t create surprises. Reliability isn’t glamorous, but it surely’s the muse of every little thing that comes after.
Asking higher questions separates L4s from folks caught at L3. When a PM asks for “conversion charge by section,” an L3 builds the question and returns the numbers. An L4 asks: “Are we attempting to establish which section to focus on, or validate an current speculation? As a result of that adjustments whether or not we should always have a look at conversion charge or incremental elevate.” You begin seeing the why behind requests, which suggests you’ll be able to usually clear up the precise drawback somewhat than simply the said query.
Seeing the following step earlier than being instructed could be a very powerful L4 habits. You end analyzing experiment outcomes, and as an alternative of ready for somebody to ask, you’ve already drafted three follow-up experiment concepts with tough scopes. You see a knowledge high quality problem and file the ticket to repair it earlier than anybody notices the bug of their dashboard. You ship the quarterly metric overview and proactively flag the one metric that’s trending in a regarding route.
Right here’s what this seems like in follow: You ship your first challenge end-to-end with out PM handholding. Perhaps it’s redesigning the person onboarding circulate. You don’t simply run the experiment, you write the one-pager proposing it, outline the metrics with the PM, implement the logging with the engineers, analyze the outcomes, current to management, and coordinate the total rollout. Six months earlier, 5 completely different folks would have pushed these steps. Now it’s you. That’s the L4 transition.
The L3 → L4 soar is about proving you may be trusted with greater issues. As soon as your supervisor is aware of you’ll end what you begin, see round corners, and ship high quality work with out supervision, they can provide you ambiguous tasks. Which brings us to L5.
L4 → L5: Turning into Strategic
If L3 → L4 is about dependable execution, L4 → L5 is about changing into the one that defines what issues are price fixing within the first place.
That is the place most knowledge scientists get caught. They hold perfecting their execution—working cleaner experiments, constructing extra refined fashions, mastering new instruments—whereas lacking the elemental shift their firm expects. L5 isn’t about doing the work higher. It’s about deciding what work ought to exist.
Scoping ambiguous issues turns into your core ability. At L4, a PM palms you a query: “Why did engagement drop final month?” You examine and return a solution. At L5, management says “progress is slowing” and also you flip that into 5 concrete hypotheses, a prioritized investigation plan, and a timeline for decision-making. You’re snug with ambiguity as a result of your job is to resolve it for others.
This exhibits up in the way you method new initiatives. A product workforce says “we have to enhance retention.” An L4 asks: “What evaluation would you like?” An L5 pushes again with construction: “Let’s outline what retention success seems like first. Are we optimizing day-7, day-30, or long-term engagement? What’s the enterprise case? Are we attempting to hit an org-level KPI or validate a product wager? That adjustments every little thing about how we should always method this.” At L5, you’re doing the strategic pondering that no one else has time for.
Designing metrics separates L5s from L4s greater than another ability. At L4, you measure what you’re instructed to measure. At L5, you perceive that metric selection is technique. When your organization debates whether or not to optimize for day by day energetic customers or time spent per session, you’re the one that can articulate the tradeoffs: DAU optimization would possibly juice short-term engagement by means of notifications whereas degrading long-term person expertise; time-per-session may reward addictive options over helpful ones. L5s don’t simply calculate metrics, as an alternative they contemplate whether or not they’ll drive the fitting habits. It’s understanding which you can optimize the improper metric completely and nonetheless hurt the enterprise.
Influencing PMs turns into a core a part of your job. At L4, you’re responsive: PMs set priorities and also you execute. At L5, you’re proactive: you see alternatives within the knowledge and persuade PMs to wager on them. This could be analyzing person habits knowledge, noticing {that a} small section has 10x greater lifetime worth, constructing a enterprise case for why the product workforce ought to focus their subsequent quarter on increasing that section, and driving the dialog in planning conferences till it’s on the roadmap.
This affect requires a totally completely different communication type. You cease answering questions and begin shaping which questions matter. You write technique memos, not evaluation reviews. You current suggestions, not findings. The evaluation continues to be rigorous, but it surely’s in service of driving selections, not documenting what you probably did.
Considering in tradeoffs could be the deepest L5 mindset shift. L4s search the “proper reply.” L5s perceive that almost all product selections contain competing values with no clear winner. And your job is to make these tradeoffs express so leaders can resolve. Ought to we launch the function with identified bugs to hit a deadline, or delay for high quality? There’s no purely data-driven reply, however you’ll be able to quantify the tradeoffs: “Launching now reaches 2M customers throughout peak season however traditionally our buggy launches see 40% greater assist prices and 15% greater churn. Right here’s what that appears like in greenback phrases.”
Right here’s what L5 seems like in follow: You lead a brand new experiment technique that adjustments the product roadmap. Perhaps progress has stalled and the workforce is working disconnected exams. You plan a scientific testing framework: outline a coherent person journey to optimize, map out the highest-leverage factors to check, create a shared metric tree so groups aren’t optimizing conflicting objectives, and set up a six-month roadmap of experiments sequenced by dependency and studying worth. This isn’t evaluation, it’s technique. You’ve formed how your total product org thinks about progress for the following two quarters. That’s the L5 transition.
The L4 → L5 soar is about increasing from executing options to defining issues. When you’ve confirmed you’ll be able to take ambiguous conditions and switch them into clear paths ahead, you’re able to scale your affect past your individual work.
L5 → L6: Turning into a Multiplier
The L5 → L6 transition is the toughest to make, and the best to misconceive. It’s not about being a extra strategic particular person contributor. It’s about changing into a pressure multiplier: somebody whose affect scales by means of others. This may be as each an IC or as a supervisor.
At L6, your worth isn’t measured by the standard of your individual analyses. It’s measured by how a lot better you make everybody else’s work. This can be a brutal psychological shift for high-performing particular person contributors who constructed their careers on private excellence.
Setting frameworks others use turns into your major output. An L5 would possibly run the very best experiment in firm historical past. An L6 creates the experimentation framework that makes each workforce’s experiments higher. This may very well be a call tree for statistical check choice, a template for experiment one-pagers that forces groups to assume by means of success metrics upfront, or a standardized method to measuring incremental elevate that turns into the corporate default.
Usually an L6’s output seems to be nothing groundbreaking individually however optimizes work throughout the org. For instance, a reasonably primary “metrics overview guidelines” that forestalls dozens of groups from making metric-selection errors that may waste quarters of labor.
Mentoring issues greater than you’d count on. At L6, you’re accountable for creating L4s and L5s throughout the group, not simply your rapid workforce. This goes past code critiques. You’re educating folks how one can assume strategically. When an L4 brings you a thorny evaluation drawback, you don’t clear up it for them—you ask the questions that assist them clear up it themselves: “What determination does this evaluation must assist? Who’s the viewers and what do they already consider? What would make you assured sufficient within the end result to wager your credibility on it?”
The multiplier impact exhibits up right here: one hour of your time educating an L4 how one can scope issues correctly would possibly save them dozens of hours over the following yr, and enhance each challenge they contact. Your impact-per-hour by means of mentoring usually exceeds your affect from doing the work your self.
Driving alignment throughout groups turns into essential at L6 since you’re engaged on issues too large for any single workforce to personal. Perhaps knowledge high quality points are hurting three completely different product areas, however no one owns the underlying instrumentation. An L5 would possibly doc the issue and escalate. An L6 convenes the stakeholders, builds consensus on severity, proposes an answer that works throughout all groups’ constraints, and drives it to completion regardless of crossing organizational boundaries.
This requires a totally completely different influencing toolkit than L5. You’re not convincing one PM to prioritize your challenge, you’re aligning a number of groups round a shared drawback when every workforce has competing priorities. You get snug with statements like: “I do know this creates additional work to your workforce this quarter, however right here’s why it unblocks three different groups and saves us all six months of ache later.” You make invisible issues seen, and also you make coordination issues tractable.
Recognizing systemic knowledge points earlier than they change into crises is basic L6 work. You discover that experiment outcomes have been inconsistent these days, dig in, and uncover {that a} current instrumentation change broke randomization for five% of customers in a refined approach that no one caught. An L5 would file a bug. An L6 sees the sample: that is the third instrumentation problem this yr, which suggests the issue isn’t particular person bugs, it’s that we lack a testing and overview course of for instrumentation adjustments. You plan the method, get buy-in from engineering management, and implement it. Six months later, instrumentation high quality has improved throughout the corporate, and most of the people by no means know you’re the rationale why.
Right here’s what L6 seems like in follow: You create an experimentation overview course of that improves high quality org-wide. It’s not simply higher documentation, it’s the implementation of a light-weight peer overview system the place any experiment over a sure measurement will get reviewed by a knowledge scientist from one other workforce earlier than launch. You write the rubric, prepare the reviewers, run the primary 20 critiques your self to calibrate requirements, and set up a suggestions loop to enhance the method. Inside two quarters, experiment high quality has measurably improved (fewer invalid exams, higher metric choice, clearer documentation), and groups throughout the corporate are making higher product selections as a result of their experiments are extra reliable. You personally reviewed 5% of the experiments, however your framework improved 100% of them. That’s the L6 transition.
The L5 → L6 soar is about scaling your self by means of techniques, folks, and processes. Your work turns into extra summary: you’re optimizing how the group works, not fixing particular person issues. It could really feel much less satisfying in some methods (no one celebrates a superb framework launch), however the leverage is extraordinary.
The Sample Throughout Ranges
Wanting throughout these transitions, a transparent sample emerges: progress isn’t about studying extra methods; it’s about increasing the way you see and form the work.
L3 → L4: You increase from activity completion to drawback possession. The query adjustments from “Did I do what I used to be requested?” to “Did I clear up the issue fully?”
L4 → L5: You increase from drawback fixing to drawback definition. The query adjustments from “How do I clear up this?” to “What drawback ought to we be fixing?”
L5 → L6: You increase from defining issues to constructing the techniques that assist others outline and clear up issues. The query adjustments from “What ought to our workforce work on?” to “How can we make your complete group simpler?”
Every degree requires you to zoom out. Every degree requires you to let go of the satisfaction of hands-on work and embrace extra summary, extra leveraged contributions. Every degree requires completely different expertise—however extra importantly, other ways of fascinated with what your job truly is.
The toughest half? No one tells you this explicitly. You need to decode it from obscure suggestions about “affect” and “strategic pondering” and “scope.” Firms count on you to determine that promotion isn’t about getting higher at your present degree’s sport, it’s about noticing the brand new sport and beginning to play it earlier than anybody asks you to.
So right here’s my problem to you: Replicate on which mindset you’re presently embodying, and which one you wish to develop into.
Are you executing reliably however nonetheless ready for others to scope your work? You’re prepared to begin performing like an L5: suggest the issue definition as an alternative of ready for it. Are you already scoping issues however solely to your personal tasks? You’re prepared to begin performing like an L6: search for the frameworks and techniques that may make everybody’s work higher.
Don’t await a promotion to alter how you’re employed. Begin enjoying the following degree’s sport now. Your promotion is the corporate recognizing that you simply’ve already made the shift—not allowing you to begin.
The concepts on this submit come from my new e-book, The Strategic Knowledge Scientist: Degree Up and Thrive within the Age of AI (Amazon affiliate hyperlink).
The e-book supplies actionable frameworks, detailed plans, and real-world examples for making use of these concepts instantly in your day-to-day work—together with particular workout routines for making every degree transition, templates for the paperwork you ought to be writing at every stage, and techniques for working with AI instruments whereas constructing the strategic expertise that hold you forward of automation.
If this submit resonated with you, purchase the e-book now to study way more.
