In right this moment’s world, the reliability of information options is all the things. After we construct dashboards and stories, one expects that the numbers mirrored there are right and up-to-date. Based mostly on these numbers, insights are drawn and actions are taken. For any unexpected cause, if the dashboards are damaged or if the numbers are incorrect — then it turns into a fire-fight to repair all the things. If the problems should not fastened in time, then it damages the belief positioned on the information crew and their options.
However why would dashboards be damaged or have unsuitable numbers? If the dashboard was constructed appropriately the primary time, then 99% of the time the problem comes from the information that feeds the dashboards — from the information warehouse. Some attainable eventualities are:
- Few ETL pipelines failed, so the brand new information will not be but in
- A desk is changed with one other new one
- Some columns within the desk are dropped or renamed
- Schemas in information warehouse have modified
- And lots of extra.
There’s nonetheless an opportunity that the problem is on the Tableau web site, however in my expertise, a lot of the instances, it’s at all times because of some modifications in information warehouse. Although we all know the basis trigger, it’s not at all times easy to start out engaged on a repair. There’s no central place the place you’ll be able to verify which Tableau information sources depend on particular tables. If in case you have the Tableau Knowledge Administration add-on, it may assist, however from what I do know, its onerous to search out dependencies of customized sql queries utilized in information sources.
Nonetheless, the add-on is just too costly and most corporations don’t have it. The true ache begins when you need to undergo all the information sources manually to start out fixing it. On prime of it, you have got a string of customers in your head impatiently ready for a quick-fix. The repair itself won’t be tough, it might simply be a time-consuming one.
What if we may anticipate these points and establish impacted information sources earlier than anybody notices an issue? Wouldn’t that simply be nice? Properly, there’s a means now with the Tableau Metadata API. The Metadata API makes use of GraphQL, a question language for APIs that returns solely the information that you simply’re all in favour of. For more information on what’s attainable with GraphQL, do try GraphQL.org.
On this weblog publish, I’ll present you the way to hook up with the Tableau Metadata API utilizing Python’s Tableau Server Shopper (TSC) library to proactively establish information sources utilizing particular tables, so as to act quick earlier than any points come up. As soon as which Tableau information sources are affected by a selected desk, you may make some updates your self or alert the homeowners of these information sources concerning the upcoming modifications to allow them to be ready for it.
Connecting to the Tableau Metadata API
Lets hook up with the Tableau Server utilizing TSC. We have to import in all of the libraries we would want for the train!
### Import all required libraries
import tableauserverclient as t
import pandas as pd
import json
import ast
import re
As a way to hook up with the Metadata API, you’ll have to first create a private entry token in your Tableau Account settings. Then replace the
&
with the token you simply created. Additionally replace
along with your Tableau web site. If the connection is established efficiently, then “Related” might be printed within the output window.
### Hook up with Tableau server utilizing private entry token
tableau_auth = t.PersonalAccessTokenAuth("", "",
site_id="")
server = t.Server("https://dub01.on-line.tableau.com/", use_server_version=True)
with server.auth.sign_in(tableau_auth):
print("Related")
Lets now get an inventory of all information sources which might be printed in your web site. There are numerous attributes you’ll be able to fetch, however for the present use case, lets maintain it easy and solely get the id, title and proprietor contact data for each information supply. This might be our grasp record to which we are going to add in all different data.
############### Get all of the record of information sources in your Website
all_datasources_query = """ {
publishedDatasources {
title
id
proprietor {
title
electronic mail
}
}
}"""
with server.auth.sign_in(tableau_auth):
consequence = server.metadata.question(
all_datasources_query
)
Since I need this weblog to be focussed on tips on how to proactively establish which information sources are affected by a selected desk, I’ll not be going into the nuances of Metadata API. To raised perceive how the question works, you’ll be able to discuss with a really detailed Tableau’s personal Metadata API documentation.
One factor to notice is that the Metadata API returns information in a JSON format. Relying on what you’re querying, you’ll find yourself with a number of nested json lists and it could possibly get very difficult to transform this right into a pandas dataframe. For the above metadata question, you’ll find yourself with a consequence which would really like beneath (that is mock information simply to provide you an concept of what the output seems like):
{
"information": {
"publishedDatasources": [
{
"name": "Sales Performance DataSource",
"id": "f3b1a2c4-1234-5678-9abc-1234567890ab",
"owner": {
"name": "Alice Johnson",
"email": "[email protected]"
}
},
{
"title": "Buyer Orders DataSource",
"id": "a4d2b3c5-2345-6789-abcd-2345678901bc",
"proprietor": {
"title": "Bob Smith",
"electronic mail": "[email protected]"
}
},
{
"title": "Product Returns and Profitability",
"id": "c5e3d4f6-3456-789a-bcde-3456789012cd",
"proprietor": {
"title": "Alice Johnson",
"electronic mail": "[email protected]"
}
},
{
"title": "Buyer Segmentation Evaluation",
"id": "d6f4e5a7-4567-89ab-cdef-4567890123de",
"proprietor": {
"title": "Charlie Lee",
"electronic mail": "[email protected]"
}
},
{
"title": "Regional Gross sales Traits (Customized SQL)",
"id": "e7a5f6b8-5678-9abc-def0-5678901234ef",
"proprietor": {
"title": "Bob Smith",
"electronic mail": "[email protected]"
}
}
]
}
}
We have to convert this JSON response right into a dataframe in order that its simple to work with. Discover that we have to extract the title and electronic mail of the proprietor from contained in the proprietor object.
### We have to convert the response into dataframe for straightforward information manipulation
col_names = consequence['data']['publishedDatasources'][0].keys()
master_df = pd.DataFrame(columns=col_names)
for i in consequence['data']['publishedDatasources']:
tmp_dt = {ok:v for ok,v in i.gadgets()}
master_df = pd.concat([master_df, pd.DataFrame.from_dict(tmp_dt, orient='index').T])
# Extract the proprietor title and electronic mail from the proprietor object
master_df['owner_name'] = master_df['owner'].apply(lambda x: x.get('title') if isinstance(x, dict) else None)
master_df['owner_email'] = master_df['owner'].apply(lambda x: x.get('electronic mail') if isinstance(x, dict) else None)
master_df.reset_index(inplace=True)
master_df.drop(['index','owner'], axis=1, inplace=True)
print('There are ', master_df.form[0] , ' datasources in your web site')
That is how the construction of master_df
would seem like:
As soon as we have now the principle record prepared, we are able to go forward and begin getting the names of the tables embedded within the information sources. If you’re an avid Tableau person, that there are two methods to deciding on tables in a Tableau information supply — one is to immediately select the tables and set up a relation between them and the opposite is to make use of a customized sql question with a number of tables to realize a brand new resultant desk. Due to this fact, we have to deal with each the instances.
Processing of Customized SQL question tables
Under is the question to get the record of all customized SQLs used within the web site together with their information sources. Discover that I’ve filtered the record to get solely first 500 customized sql queries. In case there are extra in your org, you’ll have to use an offset to get the following set of customized sql queries. There’s additionally an choice of utilizing cursor technique in Pagination if you wish to fetch massive record of outcomes (refer right here). For the sake of simplicity, I simply use the offset technique as I do know, as there are lower than 500 customized sql queries used on the positioning.
# Get the information sources and the desk names from all of the customized sql queries used in your Website
custom_table_query = """ {
customSQLTablesConnection(first: 500){
nodes {
id
title
downstreamDatasources {
title
}
question
}
}
}
"""
with server.auth.sign_in(tableau_auth):
custom_table_query_result = server.metadata.question(
custom_table_query
)
Based mostly on our mock information, that is how our output would seem like:
{
"information": {
"customSQLTablesConnection": {
"nodes": [
{
"id": "csql-1234",
"name": "RegionalSales_CustomSQL",
"downstreamDatasources": [
{
"name": "Regional Sales Trends (Custom SQL)"
}
],
"question": "SELECT r.region_name, SUM(s.sales_amount) AS total_sales FROM ecommerce.sales_data.Gross sales s JOIN ecommerce.sales_data.Areas r ON s.region_id = r.region_id GROUP BY r.region_name"
},
{
"id": "csql-5678",
"title": "ProfitabilityAnalysis_CustomSQL",
"downstreamDatasources": [
{
"name": "Product Returns and Profitability"
}
],
"question": "SELECT p.product_category, SUM(s.revenue) AS total_profit FROM ecommerce.sales_data.Gross sales s JOIN ecommerce.sales_data.Merchandise p ON s.product_id = p.product_id GROUP BY p.product_category"
},
{
"id": "csql-9101",
"title": "CustomerSegmentation_CustomSQL",
"downstreamDatasources": [
{
"name": "Customer Segmentation Analysis"
}
],
"question": "SELECT c.customer_id, c.location, COUNT(o.order_id) AS total_orders FROM ecommerce.sales_data.Prospects c JOIN ecommerce.sales_data.Orders o ON c.customer_id = o.customer_id GROUP BY c.customer_id, c.location"
},
{
"id": "csql-3141",
"title": "CustomerOrders_CustomSQL",
"downstreamDatasources": [
{
"name": "Customer Orders DataSource"
}
],
"question": "SELECT o.order_id, o.customer_id, o.order_date, o.sales_amount FROM ecommerce.sales_data.Orders o WHERE o.order_status = 'Accomplished'"
},
{
"id": "csql-3142",
"title": "CustomerProfiles_CustomSQL",
"downstreamDatasources": [
{
"name": "Customer Orders DataSource"
}
],
"question": "SELECT c.customer_id, c.customer_name, c.section, c.location FROM ecommerce.sales_data.Prospects c WHERE c.active_flag = 1"
},
{
"id": "csql-3143",
"title": "CustomerReturns_CustomSQL",
"downstreamDatasources": [
{
"name": "Customer Orders DataSource"
}
],
"question": "SELECT r.return_id, r.order_id, r.return_reason FROM ecommerce.sales_data.Returns r"
}
]
}
}
}
Similar to earlier than after we had been creating the grasp record of information sources, right here additionally we have now nested json for the downstream information sources the place we would want to extract solely the “title” a part of it. Within the “question” column, the whole customized sql is dumped. If we use regex sample, we are able to simply seek for the names of the desk used within the question.
We all know that the desk names at all times come after FROM or a JOIN clause and so they usually observe the format
. The
is non-compulsory and a lot of the instances not used. There have been some queries I discovered which used this format and I ended up solely getting the database and schema names, and never the whole desk title. As soon as we have now extracted the names of the information sources and the names of the tables, we have to merge the rows per information supply as there will be a number of customized sql queries utilized in a single information supply.
### Convert the customized sql response into dataframe
col_names = custom_table_query_result['data']['customSQLTablesConnection']['nodes'][0].keys()
cs_df = pd.DataFrame(columns=col_names)
for i in custom_table_query_result['data']['customSQLTablesConnection']['nodes']:
tmp_dt = {ok:v for ok,v in i.gadgets()}
cs_df = pd.concat([cs_df, pd.DataFrame.from_dict(tmp_dt, orient='index').T])
# Extract the information supply title the place the customized sql question was used
cs_df['data_source'] = cs_df.downstreamDatasources.apply(lambda x: x[0]['name'] if x and 'title' in x[0] else None)
cs_df.reset_index(inplace=True)
cs_df.drop(['index','downstreamDatasources'], axis=1,inplace=True)
### We have to extract the desk names from the sql question. We all know the desk title comes after FROM or JOIN clause
# Observe that the title of desk will be of the format ..
# Relying on the format of how desk is known as, you'll have to modify the regex expression
def extract_tables(sql):
# Regex to match database.schema.desk or schema.desk, keep away from alias
sample = r'(?:FROM|JOIN)s+((?:[w+]|w+).(?:[w+]|w+)(?:.(?:[w+]|w+))?)b'
matches = re.findall(sample, sql, re.IGNORECASE)
return record(set(matches)) # Distinctive desk names
cs_df['customSQLTables'] = cs_df['query'].apply(extract_tables)
cs_df = cs_df[['data_source','customSQLTables']]
# We have to merge datasources as there will be a number of customized sqls utilized in the identical information supply
cs_df = cs_df.groupby('data_source', as_index=False).agg({
'customSQLTables': lambda x: record(set(merchandise for sublist in x for merchandise in sublist)) # Flatten & make distinctive
})
print('There are ', cs_df.form[0], 'datasources with customized sqls utilized in it')
After we carry out all of the above operations, that is how the construction of cs_df
would seem like:

Processing of standard Tables in Knowledge Sources
Now we have to get the record of all of the common tables utilized in a datasource which aren’t part of customized SQL. There are two methods to go about it. Both use the publishedDatasources
object and verify for upstreamTables
or use DatabaseTable
and verify for upstreamDatasources
. I’ll go by the primary technique as a result of I need the outcomes at a knowledge supply stage (mainly, I need some code able to reuse after I wish to verify a selected information supply in additional element). Right here once more, for the sake of simplicity, as an alternative of going for pagination, I’m looping via every datasource to make sure I’ve all the things. We get the upstreamTables
inside the sector object in order that must be cleaned out.
############### Get the information sources with the common desk names utilized in your web site
### Its greatest to extract the tables data for each information supply after which merge the outcomes.
# Since we solely get the desk data nested beneath fields, in case there are tons of of fields
# utilized in a single information supply, we are going to hit the response limits and won't be able to retrieve all the information.
data_source_list = master_df.title.tolist()
col_names = ['name', 'id', 'extractLastUpdateTime', 'fields']
ds_df = pd.DataFrame(columns=col_names)
with server.auth.sign_in(tableau_auth):
for ds_name in data_source_list:
question = """ {
publishedDatasources (filter: { title: """"+ ds_name + """" }) {
title
id
extractLastUpdateTime
fields {
title
upstreamTables {
title
}
}
}
} """
ds_name_result = server.metadata.question(
question
)
for i in ds_name_result['data']['publishedDatasources']:
tmp_dt = {ok:v for ok,v in i.gadgets() if ok != 'fields'}
tmp_dt['fields'] = json.dumps(i['fields'])
ds_df = pd.concat([ds_df, pd.DataFrame.from_dict(tmp_dt, orient='index').T])
ds_df.reset_index(inplace=True)
That is how the construction of ds_df
would look:

We are able to must flatten out the fields
object and extract the sector names in addition to the desk names. Because the desk names might be repeating a number of instances, we must deduplicate to maintain solely the distinctive ones.
# Operate to extract the values of fields and upstream tables in json lists
def extract_values(json_list, key):
values = []
for merchandise in json_list:
values.append(merchandise[key])
return values
ds_df["fields"] = ds_df["fields"].apply(ast.literal_eval)
ds_df['field_names'] = ds_df.apply(lambda x: extract_values(x['fields'],'title'), axis=1)
ds_df['upstreamTables'] = ds_df.apply(lambda x: extract_values(x['fields'],'upstreamTables'), axis=1)
# Operate to extract the distinctive desk names
def extract_upstreamTable_values(table_list):
values = set()a
for inner_list in table_list:
for merchandise in inner_list:
if 'title' in merchandise:
values.add(merchandise['name'])
return record(values)
ds_df['upstreamTables'] = ds_df.apply(lambda x: extract_upstreamTable_values(x['upstreamTables']), axis=1)
ds_df.drop(["index","fields"], axis=1, inplace=True)
As soon as we do the above operations, the ultimate construction of ds_df
would look one thing like this:

We have now all of the items and now we simply need to merge them collectively:
###### Be a part of all the information collectively
master_data = pd.merge(master_df, ds_df, how="left", on=["name","id"])
master_data = pd.merge(master_data, cs_df, how="left", left_on="title", right_on="data_source")
# Save the outcomes to analyse additional
master_data.to_excel("Tableau Knowledge Sources with Tables.xlsx", index=False)
That is our last master_data
:

Desk-level Affect Evaluation
Let’s say there have been some schema modifications on the “Gross sales” desk and also you wish to know which information sources might be impacted. Then you’ll be able to merely write a small perform which checks if a desk is current in both of the 2 columns — upstreamTables
or customSQLTables
like beneath.
def filter_rows_with_table(df, col1, col2, target_table):
"""
Filters rows in df the place target_table is a part of any worth in both col1 or col2 (helps partial match).
Returns full rows (all columns retained).
"""
return df[
df.apply(
lambda row:
(isinstance(row[col1], record) and any(target_table in merchandise for merchandise in row[col1])) or
(isinstance(row[col2], record) and any(target_table in merchandise for merchandise in row[col2])),
axis=1
)
]
# For example
filter_rows_with_table(master_data, 'upstreamTables', 'customSQLTables', 'Gross sales')
Under is the output. You may see that 3 information sources might be impacted by this variation. You can even alert the information supply homeowners Alice and Bob prematurely about this to allow them to begin engaged on a repair earlier than one thing breaks on the Tableau dashboards.

You may try the whole model of the code in my Github repository right here.
That is simply one of many potential use-cases of the Tableau Metadata API. You can even extract the sector names utilized in customized sql queries and add to the dataset to get a field-level influence evaluation. One can even monitor the stale information sources with the extractLastUpdateTime
to see if these have any points or must be archived if they don’t seem to be used any extra. We are able to additionally use the dashboards
object to fetch data at a dashboard stage.
Ultimate Ideas
If in case you have come this far, kudos. This is only one use case of automating Tableau information administration. It’s time to mirror by yourself work and suppose which of these different duties you might automate to make your life simpler. I hope this mini-project served as an pleasing studying expertise to know the ability of Tableau Metadata API. Should you preferred studying this, you may additionally like one other considered one of my weblog posts about Tableau, on among the challenges I confronted when coping with massive .
Additionally do try my earlier weblog the place I explored constructing an interactive, database-powered app with Python, Streamlit, and SQLite.
Earlier than you go…
Comply with me so that you don’t miss any new posts I write in future; one can find extra of my articles on my . You can even join with me on LinkedIn or Twitter!