Yesterday, the FBI claimed that there was no “lacking minute” in safety footage of billionaire pedophile Jeffrey Epstein’s final night time in jail. Maybe they have been making an attempt to get in entrance of an incoming bombshell: “CBS Information investigation of Jeffrey Epstein jail video reveals new discrepancies.” Furthermore, it undermines officers’ declare that nobody had entered the realm the place Epstein was housed when he died.
It is a declare that is been repeated by different prime federal officers, together with FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino, who mentioned on Fox Information’ “Fox and Buddies” in Might, “There’s video clear as day — he is the one particular person in there and the one particular person popping out.”
However a CBS Information evaluation of the video the FBI made public earlier this month reveals that the recording does not present a transparent view of the doorway to Epstein’s cell block — considered one of a number of contradictions between officers’ descriptions of the video and the video itself.
CBS Information additionally digitally reconstructed the Particular Housing Unit, or SHU, the place Epstein was held, utilizing diagrams and descriptions from the 2023 report on Epstein launched by the Justice Division inspector common. The CBS Information assessment discovered the video does little to supply proof to assist claims that have been later made by federal officers. Moreover, CBS Information has recognized a number of inconsistencies between that report and the video that elevate severe questions concerning the accuracy of witness statements and the thoroughness of the federal government’s investigation.
Rationally, it appears unlikely that most of the elite vacationers visiting Epstein’s non-public island did something unlawful there, even when some did and the remaining foolishly subjected themselves to blackmail. And rationally, it appears loopy to suppose (and cynical to recommend) that he was murdered in jail and the federal government lined it up. However they’ve ensured that no-one can see the accessible proof within the first case and now been caught red-handed tampering with and falsely describing the proof within the latter case. All bets are off.
