The Delaware Courtroom of Chancery has ordered Nano Dimension to finish its $183 million merger with Desktop Metallic (DM), following a courtroom trial held between March 11-12, 2025.
Final 12 months, Desktop Metallic filed a lawsuit in opposition to Nano Dimension, accusing the Israeli micro-3D printing specialist of failing to make “affordable greatest efforts” to achieve well timed regulatory approval. In its post-trial opinion and order, the Courtroom dominated that Nano had “materially breached the Merger Settlement,” rejected the defendant’s counterclaims, and granted Desktop Metallic particular efficiency.
Nano should signal a nationwide safety settlement with the US Committee on Overseas Funding inside 48 hours of the Courtroom’s March 24 order. That is the ultimate situation for closing the deal. Moreover, if Nano fails to finalize the merger by March 31, 2025, DM might lengthen the deadline till its completion.
Below Courtroom of Chancery Rule 54(b), the ruling is straight away appealable to the Delaware Supreme Courtroom as a result of it constitutes a remaining judgment on the precise efficiency claims. Desktop Metallic intends to maneuver swiftly and shut the merger settlement as rapidly as doable “whereas persevering with to serve its clients, staff and different stakeholders.” Ric Fulop, CEO of the Massachusetts-based industrial 3D printer producer, beforehand warned that failing to finish the deal may result in a “deadly prognosis” for Desktop Metallic.
After the Courtroom’s ruling, DM’s inventory surged 97.3%, rising from $2.22 on March 24 to $4.38 the next day. In line with Bloomberg information, Desktop Metallic’s inventory surge marks its largest intraday leap ever. In the meantime, Nano Dimension dropped 19.9%, falling from $2.11 to a low of $1.69 on March 25.
Nano Dimension to finish Desktop Metallic merger?
In July 2024, Nano Dimension agreed to accumulate Nano Dimension in an all-cash deal value roughly $183 million, or $5.50 per share. On the time, then-Nano Dimension CEO Yoav Stern claimed the mix would create a bigger, extra diversified firm to speed up progress and generate long-term worth for shareholders. The mixed entity was reported to supply a robust monetary profile, with $246M in joint FY 2023 income, 28% of which was recurring.
The merger settlement got here amid a interval of financial challenges for Desktop Metallic. In Q2’24, the corporate’s income fell by 26.9% YoY to $38.9 million, whereas working loss grew 108.8% YoY to -$101.3 million. Throughout a Q2 2024 earnings name with Nano Dimension buyers, Fulop argued that the enterprise mixture “represents the most effective path ahead” for his firm. He additionally famous that the failure to finalize the settlement may mark the top of Desktop Metallic’s existence.
In December 2024, questions have been raised over the deal’s future when Desktop Metallic filed its lawsuit in opposition to Nano Dimension. The defendant denied the allegations, arguing that the go well with was “with out advantage” and “inconsistent with the phrases of the Merger Settlement.”
DM rapidly adopted this with a second lawsuit naming US FDM 3D printer OEM Markforged as a co-defendant. The go well with alleges that Nano’s deliberate $115 million acquisition of Markforged, introduced in September 2024, violated its settlement with Desktop Metallic, threatening its completion.
Nano Dimension’s boardroom adjustments additionally raised doubts in regards to the firm’s M&A exercise. In the beginning of December 2024, a shareholder vote noticed Yoav Stern faraway from the Nano Dimension Board. The choice got here through the firm’s Annual Common Assembly of Shareholders (AGM), which additionally noticed incumbent Director Michael X. Garrett eliminated. Ofir Baharav and Robert Pons, nominated by activist shareholder Murchinson Ltd., have been additionally elected to the Board of Administrators.
Following the AGM, six of Nano Dimension’s incumbent administrators, Dr. Yoav Nissan-Cohen, Eitan Ben-Eliahu, Oded Gera, Roni Kleinfeld, Chris Moran, and Georgette Mosbacher, additionally resigned from the Board. On the time, this left Baharav and Pons, Kenneth Traub, and Dr. Joshua Rosensweig because the remaining Nano Dimension Board members.
Earlier than 2024 ended, Murchinson scored one other victory when Yoav Stern was eliminated as Nano Dimension CEO. The activist investor was a long-time critic of Stern’s management, repeatedly difficult his stewardship by elevating issues over capital allocation and poor governance.
Stern was a vocal advocate of M&A exercise, and his elimination raised issues across the Markforged and Desktop Metallic agreements. Earlier than the 2024 AGM, Murchinson printed a letter calling the provides for Desktop Metallic and Markforged “overpriced” and “misguided. In a press launch, the group known as on the restructured board to “fastidiously and critically look at … the deserves and success of previous and current acquisitions.”
Regardless of Murchinson’s reservations, the Courtroom ruling leaves Nano Dimension with little alternative however to finish the merger.
3D printing M&A exercise
Mergers and acquisitions exercise has been a key theme within the 3D printing business this 12 months.
Earlier this month, US-based specialty metals options supplier United Efficiency Metals (UPM) acquired Fabrisonic LLC, an Ohio-based metallic 3D printing manufacturing firm. The deal will see UPM, an affiliate of O’Neal Industries, improve and increase its manufacturing capabilities. Following the acquisition, Fabrisonic will be part of UPM’s specialty processing community. Jason Riley, Common Supervisor of Fabrisonic, claimed that the deal “marks an essential growth for Fabrisonic” and helps the agency “lengthen our attain and proceed delivering options to our clients.”
Elsewhere, direct-to-consumer (DTC) 3D printing furnishings startup Mannequin No. was just lately acquired by additive manufacturing printing service supplier IC3D. Earlier than the sale, Mannequin No. had confronted pertinent challenges in scaling its operations. This was negatively impacted by the excessive prices of sustaining and upgrading its specialised 3D printing gear. The settlement will see CEO Phillip Raub depart the corporate, with none of Mannequin No.’s staff transitioning to IC3D.
Who gained the 2024 3D Printing Trade Awards?
Subscribe to the 3D Printing Trade e-newsletter to maintain up with the most recent 3D printing information.
You can too comply with us on LinkedIn, and subscribe to the 3D Printing Trade Youtube channel to entry extra unique content material.
Featured picture exhibits Nano Dimension workplaces in Munich. Photograph by Michael Petch.
