The vanguard CIOs I’ve labored with through the years constructed their organizations on fashionable ideas of management, group improvement, staff constructing and variety. They weren’t solely robust technical leaders, however in addition they excelled at shaping resilient groups and a robust tradition.
A brand new e-book by Phil Le-Brun and Jana Werner with the intriguing title “The Octopus Group” reinforces the significance of understanding the folks and organizational sides of management.
Le-Brun, now an government in residence at AWS, beforehand served as McDonald’s company vice chairman of world improvement and worldwide CIO. Werner can be an AWS government in residence; she previously led the enterprise transformation apply at AWS in EMEA and digital transformation at Tesco Financial institution.
The e-book is written for CIOs, their CEOs and fellow C-suite executives. In a dialog with Le-Brun, he made the case that efficient CIOs have interaction immediately with their government groups and boards — each inside IT and throughout the broader enterprise C-suites — to speed up their studying curves. The mandate for a company’s prime IT skilled is to not solely translate the expertise for nontechnical executives, but additionally clarify the way it connects to enterprise outcomes.
Phil Le-Brun, co-author, ‘The Octopus Group’
“Our core conviction is that the true potential of expertise will solely be unlocked when the chief management understands not simply the tech itself, however the organizational and management shifts required to turn out to be customer-centric, responsive, and resilient,” Le-Brun stated.
Werner added, “Our work has a central message for CIOs: You maintain a vital function for cultivating the traits — readability, possession and curiosity — that outline a repeatedly evolving group.”
“Know-how is the brand new management mandate,” which has ramifications for each individual within the C-suite, she stated. “Simply as each government should grasp the language of finance and management, the identical is true for expertise and knowledge. It’s now not an operational concern; it’s a core competency of the C-suite.”
Werner stated IT and knowledge competency begin with establishing radical readability across the enterprise outcomes expertise should drive. With applied sciences like AI and machine studying, the one elements limiting a company from fully reinventing its core worth proposition are its creativeness and the prevailing talent units of its folks.
The CIO’s job is to foster a tradition of curiosity that relentlessly seeks out these reinvention alternatives, acknowledging that long-term plans and roadmaps usually signify guesswork disguised as actuality.
How is that tradition of curiosity operationalized amid the quickly altering IT panorama?
The e-book is a sensible information to what works — and what would not — in organizational and folks improvement. It captures a lot of what I discovered facilitating conversations in #CIOChat on LinkedIn.
Tin Man vs. Octopus organizations
The authors illustrate the tenets of their method by contrasting two sorts of organizations — conventional, mechanistic “Tin Man” organizations vs. fashionable, adaptive “Octopus” organizations — throughout 36 administration behaviors.
For every habits, they establish what they name anti-patterns and learn how to implement corrective motion. This steerage is invaluable for leaders who have to rapidly assess, adapt, and rework their organizational atmosphere. It ought to show particularly helpful for CIOs, who typically must diagnose conditions after which decide what must be mounted.
Jana Werner, creator, ‘The Octopus Group’
Six behaviors of Tin Man organizations
Listed below are the six mainly unhealthy behaviors attribute of Tin Man organizations.
1. Inflexible buildings. Tin Man organizations are continually trying to find exterior fixes to function higher. Their enterprise mannequin emphasizes standardization, specialization, management, measuring particular person efficiency, compliance, mass manufacturing and predictable outputs — in different phrases, inflexible buildings. Even late Twentieth-century administration theorist Russell Ackoff warned that this type of machine-age considering reduces folks to perform like, effectively, machines and usually results in reactive or inactive planning.
2. Brief-term focus. Le-Brun and Werner describe Tin Man organizations as being constructed on permission-based buildings designed to attenuate threat and remove variation. This construction, which centralizes management and depends on strict guidelines, makes enterprise structure tougher and creates extremely managed data stream, as IT actions are usually both run or modified by the enterprise. Finally, this inflexible central management ends in short-term considering and stagnant IT. CIOs have commonly informed me that, as unhealthy because the expertise stack might be, persons are the toughest drawback to unravel. Because of this, it comes as no shock that many transformation failures are predominantly brought on by organizations having this working mannequin.
3. Confused priorities. Tin Man organizations depend on jargon, making a confused workforce, fragmented priorities and wasted sources. Management in these environments is continuously seen as evasive, manipulative and dishonest. Because the authors observe, these organizations “whiffle on function statements laden with buzzwords, leading to a scarcity of belief, misplaced alternatives, and issue discovering expertise.”
Tin Man organizations additionally flip all the pieces right into a “technique,” pursuing obscure, bold objectives which can be disconnected from their group’s function. Groups, not surprisingly, wrestle to know what work really issues. And since actionable objectives are missing, metrics turn out to be misused — shifting the main target from creating worth to easily hitting the numbers.
I bear in mind visiting one among Italy’s largest banks a number of years in the past. The CIO put in high-definition screens throughout places of work, particularly within the director and vice chairman places of work, displaying efficiency in opposition to 150 tracked metrics. After I requested what was most necessary, the deputy CIO stated, “all the pieces.” The response spoke volumes. Measuring all the pieces meant the group had no priorities.
4. Battle with teamwork. Even worse, Tin Man organizations have points with teamwork. Conflicting agendas, turf wars, failed cross-functional efforts and gradual decision-making are widespread. Because of this, decision-making slows, priorities are unfold too skinny and productiveness, morale and readability all undergo. Furthermore, an emphasis on customizing processes within the perception this work provides worth is in truth counterproductive. The authors observe the Gartner determine that 70% of ERP implementations fail, actually because inside processes are made unnecessarily distinctive and add no enterprise worth.
Tin Man organizations additionally create and reinforce silos by specializing in native inefficiencies as an alternative of enterprise-wide enchancment, leading to fragmented worth streams and unpredictable outcomes. These organizations hoard data, leading to poor selections, lack of aggressive benefit, a tradition of mistrust and an incapacity to regulate outcomes. In flip, this causes these organizations to lean into frequent reorgs, which lead to misplaced productiveness and shifting the main target from clients to organizational survival.
5. Breed worry. This atmosphere breeds worry. Staff members hesitate to take possession, voice issues, share concepts or admit errors — fueling disengagement and missed alternatives. Making issues worse, administration in Tin Man organizations really upholds poor management. This consists of creating gatekeeper approval processes that scale back agility and gradual time to market.
Le-Brun and Werner declare that Tin Man organizations fetishize processes. Right here, course of overwhelms judgment, decision-making turns into perfectionistic and accountability blurs.
In the meantime, poor hiring practices compound the problem, as people are valued over groups and incentives are misaligned. I bear in mind at HP, the emphasis on particular person efficiency as soon as led to me receiving an outsized bonus. Frankly, it was embarrassing — it signaled a damaged system, not distinctive efficiency.
6. Pursue the incorrect issues. Tin Man organizations prize reaching preset objectives and avoiding failure. As a substitute of listening to clients, they typically depend on proxies, inflicting them to overlook alternatives and waste sources. The authors cite Basic Magic for instance. A former colleague of mine — Apple’s sixth worker — was on Basic Magic’s management staff. The corporate created sensible expertise, nevertheless it stumbled throughout a interval when its leaders had been satisfied they already knew what the market wanted. I later suggested one other firm shaped by three CIOs with deep market information however no design companions. They, too, missed the mark, by no means fairly delivering a minimal viable product.
Making issues worse, Tin Man organizations keep away from exhausting issues and difficult conversations. Their groups are homophilic, and their leaders defer to simply measured knowledge fairly than significant insights. They separate expertise from the enterprise, specializing in techniques of document fairly than techniques of engagement. In the meantime, they downplay expertise improvement and solely fake to innovate.
3 traits of Octopus organizations
Octopus organizations, in contrast, have the next traits and behaviors:
1. Adaptable. Octopus organizations, in distinction, prioritize adaptability, decentralized possession, interconnectedness, and steady studying and experimentation. They foster connection, distinctiveness, problem-solving, company, ecosystems and long-term considering. Importantly, they can pursue a twin technique — intertwining operating the enterprise and altering the enterprise.
Octopus organizations construct numerous groups and use language that fosters readability by means of shared understanding and collective function, possession and curiosity. This creates an genuine and sensible function that conjures up groups. On the identical time, it drives sharp deal with a couple of sturdy buyer wants that generate distinctive worth. In so doing, Octopus organizations select the place to play and learn how to win.
2. Make technique a steady course of.Octopus organizations have interaction in vigorous, ongoing debate about organizational tradeoffs. This helps them establish strategic inflection factors early. One other vital habits? Octopus leaders pay attention greater than they discuss, guaranteeing objectives align with buyer worth and development. A key a part of that is understanding the why earlier than setting objectives. After which ensuring objectives are particular, comprehensible and clearly owned.
Their measures join on to worth and function, which accelerates studying. By enabling actual collaboration amongst friends, groups ship higher enterprise worth. They do that by ruthlessly prioritizing and deprioritizing — embracing “a much less, however higher” philosophy. This frees groups to deal with differentiation.
A key enabler of that is enabling staff members to immerse themselves within the buyer’s world to establish and hone differentiating capabilities. On the identical time, Octopus organizations rigorously select what not to do, specializing in the stream of worth from concept to buyer. They deal with bottlenecks throughout the complete worth stream, not simply inside departments. They keep away from hoarding insights, as an alternative making them accessible to all, creating transparency that fosters innovation.
3. Resist forms. Organizationally, they resist forms and bloat, as an alternative prioritizing each structural stability and flexibility. They impart about reorganizations early and ask exhausting questions on their investments. They attempt to develop psychological security and lead with empathy, humility and curiosity — remodeling management from a job right into a habits. With clear tenets and guardrails, they exchange checkpoints and empower self-sufficient groups that scale back dependencies and improve productiveness.
To make this work, they dismantle forms and speed up innovation by asking whether or not work might be eradicated or simplified. They favor “adequate,” reversible selections that promote velocity, studying and development. They worth studying agility and lived expertise over credentials. This produces high-performing, cross-functional groups and cultivates possession and mastery — the strongest supply of intrinsic motivation.
Merely put, Octopus organizations pursue fast, priceless studying, which, in flip, minimizes threat. They’re obsessive about understanding actual clients to make sure long-term relevance and worth. Finally, they forge new futures for patrons and reshape markets. They love issues, make investments deeply in understanding their root causes and use that perception to ship superior options. By tackling the toughest, riskiest elements of tasks first, they study and validate quicker.
They use constructive dialogue over superficial concord, strengthening staff efficiency. They improve problem-solving by means of cognitive and mental variety, making data-informed selections that respect human expertise and enhance outcomes. By investing in knowledge and digital literacy, they bridge divides and unlock innovation — turning “pink folks” (technologists) and “blue folks” (area specialists) into “purple folks,” making innovation everybody’s jobs.
40 fixes to implement at the moment
The authors present CIOs with a set of concrete strategies for rewiring their organizations for fulfillment. Right here had been the important thing ones that I might suggest to the vanguard CIOs I do know.
-
Join each initiative to concrete buyer or enterprise outcomes.
-
Be clear about your function.
-
Anchor your group on sturdy issues.
-
Make technique accessible.
-
Talk repeatedly.
-
Outline a small variety of vital objectives that deal with a problem or alternative
-
Focus metrics on studying and enchancment.
-
Conduct venture and metric postmortems.
-
Take a look at for enterprise alignment.
-
Maintain silo-busting problem-solving classes.
-
Create a “cease doing listing” and kill standards for any venture upfront.
-
Map out your aggressive benefit with buyer knowledge and validated assumptions.
-
Determine bottlenecks, handoffs and wait occasions, and use this to repair worth streams.
-
Grow to be a knowledge sharer and problem a need-to-know tradition.
-
Decriminalize unhealthy information and errors.
-
Talk early and truthfully about change.
-
Create zero-baseline budgets.
-
Be sure that leaders communicate final, ask what they’re lacking, and begin assembly with questions.
-
Domesticate self-awareness.
-
Rework gatekeepers into coaches.
-
Speed up determination velocity and consider selections as bets.
-
Create outcome-based job descriptions.
-
Broaden recognition strategies.
-
Cut back the space between clients and management.
-
Work to visualise the longer term.
-
Mandate clear drawback/alternative statements.
-
Domesticate mental honesty with tasks.
-
Audit assembly practices to reframe battle as curiosity.
-
Encourage cross-pollination in decision-making.
-
Elevate knowledge literacy and hunt down counter-narratives.
-
Search a typical enterprise vocabulary.
-
Join innovation to these closest to the client.
-
Do change with folks, not to them.
-
Entwine studying and influence.
Whereas CIOs might not all the time have the great fortune of working in Octopus organizations, they will construct one inside IT. After all, it’s actually a lot simpler to operationalize this construction if IT and the enterprise are on the identical web page. Savvy CIOs will discover the best group by which to work. For these prepared to start the journey, this e-book presents not solely clear contrasts but additionally the tangible steps for CIOs to drive significant change.
