Saturday, December 20, 2025

I examined out DeepSeek’s picture generator and I am not impressed


Robert Triggs / Android Authority

Whereas DeepSeek mania continues to take over the AI world, the Chinese language AI firm rapidly adopted up with its first picture era mannequin. Dubbed Janus Professional, it’s DeepSeek’s tackle a big language mannequin that unifies multimodal understanding and picture era, competing with present fashions like Secure Diffusion, Google’s Imagen 3, and OpenAI’s DALL-E 3.

DeepSeek is a risk to established gamers, however can Janus Professional match up?

DeepSeek’s declare to fame is its low value of coaching and entry whereas retaining the efficiency and accuracy supplied by OpenAI. So, a mannequin that may match or exceed the capabilities of the very best AI picture mills proper now could be a critical risk to efforts made by Adobe and different well-established gamers.

With AI-generated content material turning into more and more mainstream, picture fashions are anticipated to supply each inventive flexibility and photorealistic accuracy. However does Janus Professional ship on these expectations?

Laying down the testing framework

Deepseek on a smartphone

Dhruv Bhutani / Android Authority

I made a decision to check Janus Professional in opposition to 5 of the main picture era fashions. This consists of Secure Diffusion, OpenAI’s Dall-E 3, Google’s Imagen 3, Meta AI, and Adobe Firefly.

All six picture era fashions got the identical prompts, and to maintain a stage taking part in subject, I picked out the primary response as a substitute of cherry-picking the very best outcomes. It’s not essentially the most scientific technique of testing, however I needed to strategy the comparability as an peculiar consumer.

Most customers merely enter a immediate and anticipate a near-perfect outcome on the primary strive. That’s why I prioritized testing with quick, unfiltered outputs to simulate the typical consumer expertise.

How nicely can AI generate photorealistic pictures?

For my first check, I needed to see how every picture era mannequin would strategy making a photorealistic picture. I examined for a selected state of affairs, lighting, and the way nicely it may recreate an animal. Right here’s the immediate I used: A photorealistic picture of a fats orange cat chasing a yarn of wool in a sunny backyard.

Photorealistic pictures are significantly difficult for AI fashions as a result of they require exact consideration to mild sources, texture particulars, and spatial depth. I centered on how realistically the fashions rendered the cat’s fur, the play of daylight on the backyard, and whether or not the yarn appeared dynamic and tactile.

A fast look is sufficient to notice that Janus Professional has extra in frequent with the primary launch of the Dall E text-to-image mannequin than something newer. The result’s pretty low decision and undoubtedly not very photorealistic. Secure Diffusion, however, will get very near the photorealistic immediate, although the outsized tail provides away its AI roots.

Rating in third place could be Adobe’s Firefly. You would nearly be fooled that the picture was a extremely edited {photograph}. Nonetheless, the face provides it away. Lastly, Imagen 3, Dall E, and Meta AI do an honest job, however I wouldn’t actually name any of these pictures photorealistic.

Testing AI’s skill to seize range and element

For my second check, I made a decision to lift the issue stage. AI fashions often battle with recreating pure faces, arms, and a various group of individuals. Including very particular directions for the setting and lighting circumstances creates a reasonably powerful check for any present picture era mannequin. This time, my immediate was extra detailed, as AI fashions profit from granular directions: A gaggle selfie of multicultural faculty college students consuming lunch outdoors a ski resort, with detailed faces — male, feminine, numerous — throughout winter at midday, beneath a partly cloudy blue sky.

The challenges right here have been quite a few, from precisely capturing assorted pores and skin tones to rendering reasonable facial expressions and guaranteeing arms didn’t look distorted.

As soon as once more, Janus Professional falls far behind the opposite picture era fashions. It’s actually no competitors in any respect. Regardless of the uncanny AI-ness seen in all of the photographs, Secure Diffusion, Adobe Firefly, and Imagen 3 put up a tricky problem right here, a lot in order that I put it up for debate throughout the Android Authority Slack channel. Personally, I’d lean in direction of Imagen 3’s outcomes right here.

A check of creativity

For my remaining check, I needed to see how the picture era fashions would carry out with extra inventive pursuits. I requested them to create a brand new cartoon character impressed by traditional Disney characters. Right here’s the immediate I used: A cartoon character based mostly on traditional Disney characters, full with large eyes, and enjoyable, fantastical traits.

What makes Disney-inspired characters iconic are their expressive eyes, whimsical design components, and playful proportions. I used to be searching for a design that captured that “magic” with out feeling by-product.

If Hieronymus Bosch determined to color Disney characters, he’d most likely find yourself with one thing like Janus Professional’s output. Secure Diffusion, however, straight-up outputs a youthful model of Elsa from Frozen. It did nail the project, although, so I’d name Secure Diffusion the winner.

If Hieronymus Bosch determined to color Disney characters, he’d most likely find yourself with one thing like Janus Professional’s output.

The opposite picture era fashions didn’t fairly nail the Disney aesthetic, and I’d say Meta AI’s outcomes have been nearer to Pixar. Regardless, all fashions barring Janus may function a place to begin when brainstorming concepts.

Is Janus Professional a critical contender in picture era?

using pixel studio for interior design ideas 1

Rita El Khoury / Android Authority

I’m not an enormous fan of image-generation fashions typically. They lack the soul and creativity that may solely come from an precise artist. Nonetheless, they are often helpful in fast prototyping, producing concepts, or serving as simplistic additions for instance some extent in a presentation.

For instance, advertising and marketing professionals typically flip to those instruments for social media posts or fast visible mockups, whereas educators could use them for inventive lesson supplies. Sport designers may generate fantastical environments or character concepts as a basis for artists to refine. However can these fashions ever actually exchange a human artist’s creativeness? That continues to be some extent of debate.

Janus Professional indicators Deepseek’s entry into picture era, however it has an extended solution to go earlier than standing toe-to-toe with trade leaders.

Janus Professional could mark DeepSeek’s entry into the picture era house, however it clearly has an extended solution to go earlier than standing toe-to-toe with established fashions like Secure Diffusion, Adobe Firefly, and Imagen 3.

Whereas it struggled with photorealistic imagery, complicated facial compositions, and inventive prompts, its existence reveals that competitors in AI improvement is simply intensifying. Because the expertise evolves, it’s thrilling to think about the place image-generation fashions will head subsequent — and whether or not Janus Professional can ultimately turn into a critical contender.

Related Articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Articles

PHP Code Snippets Powered By : XYZScripts.com