At first look, palletizing ice cream cone containers doesn’t sound like a high-risk job. However when these containers weigh 35 to 40 kilos and have to be stacked shoulder-high, shift after shift, 5 days per week—you begin to perceive the pressure it places on individuals.
That’s precisely what one main U.S. meals producer realized. They produce a variety of cones—waffles, sugar, and cake. Regardless of their scale and attain, what actually stood out to us was one thing else: their tradition.
This firm operates as an ESOP—an Worker Inventory Possession Plan—which implies each particular person on the ground has actual pores and skin within the sport. From the entrance workplace to the manufacturing line, all of them personal a bit of the enterprise. And when that’s the case, security turns into greater than a coverage. It turns into private.
Why automate?
It wasn’t a labor scarcity that drove their determination to automate palletizing. It wasn’t even about effectivity within the conventional sense. The spark got here from a really human place: too many shoulder accidents. Lifting heavy containers again and again, particularly to the highest of a pallet, was inflicting issues. The type that takes individuals out of labor and places long-term pressure on the crew. They didn’t wish to look forward to the subsequent harm. They wished to forestall it.
So, they made a transfer. They selected to herald a robotic palletizing system—to not change somebody, however to take away the chance from a job that simply didn’t make sense for individuals to be doing anymore.
What made this a very good match?
The technical facet was simple. The containers are hefty, they’re nicely throughout the payload vary of a cobot palletizer. The corporate already had Common Robots on-site, so integrating one other one with our PE20 was acquainted territory.
However the true match wasn’t about velocity or specs. It was about care. They weren’t attempting to remove a job. The palletizing job was simply considered one of many dealt with by their crew. What they wished was to remove the harm danger. Plain and easy. Plus, the convenience of use of the programming interface allowed to upskill some operators who can now use the robotic.
A takeaway for meals producers
Automation sometimes will get evaluated by the lens of labor financial savings. However this story is a reminder: ergonomics matter. Employee security isn’t a smooth metric—it’s a robust purpose to rethink handbook duties. Heavy lifting, repetitive motions, and awkward positions take a toll. And even if you happen to’ve acquired succesful individuals in your crew, that doesn’t imply they need to be doing these jobs.
This isn’t about chasing buzzwords like “lights-out manufacturing.” It’s about fixing actual issues in actual vegetation, with sensible instruments that work.
And if you happen to’re operating a facility the place your crew is your best asset—like this one—you may discover that the enterprise case for automation is stronger than you suppose. For in-depth insights on the toll handbook palletizing can tackle an organization and the way automation can alleviate these strains, obtain our Guide Palletizing Ergonomic Dangers e-book by business professional, Carla Silver.
