Uncover how patient-customized 3D printed units like Stentra™ considerably scale back excessive toxicity-related therapy prices and enhance workflow efficiencies to deal with extra instances extra successfully time beyond regulation.
Introduction: The Financial Paradox in Oncology
For years, the Additive Manufacturing (AM) trade has battled a persistent delusion: that customization is an costly luxurious. Whereas this will likely maintain true in shopper markets, the other is usually the case for healthcare. In oncology, the place precision, consistency, and effectivity instantly have an effect on outcomes, a one-size-fits-all method can quietly price well being methods billions.
For radiation oncology, generic options steadily generate failure demand: the downstream scientific and operational burden of managing avoidable issues. The return on funding (ROI) of personalised 3D printing is due to this fact not restricted to improved scientific accuracy; it represents a monetary technique that converts inefficiency, rework, and toxicity into measurable financial savings. By shifting from generic instruments to patient-specific options, hospitals can enhance affected person expertise, assist clinicians, and strengthen their backside line.
The Hidden Price of “One-Measurement-Matches-All”
For example, in Head and Neck Most cancers (HNC) radiation remedy, the usual of care usually entails rudimentary instruments like cork and normal chunk blocks. Whereas cheap to buy, these units are pricey in follow. Inconsistent immobilization and insufficient tissue displacement introduce variability between fractions, growing pointless radiation publicity to wholesome tissue.
The downstream consequence is monetary toxicity. Sufferers uncovered to unintended radiation steadily develop extreme oral mucositis (SOM)—a painful, debilitating complication that extends far past discomfort. Research present that mucositis and pharyngitis in HNC and lung most cancers sufferers are related to roughly $17,000 in imply further price per affected person, pushed by unplanned hospitalizations, feeding tube placement, and intensive supportive care (Elting LS et al.).
For sufferers, this implies avoidable struggling throughout an already tough journey. For clinicians and directors, it interprets into useful resource pressure, unpredictable workflows, and escalating prices.
The Worth of Customized-built AM Options
How can scalable customization scale back hospital prices? By stopping the issues that drive high-acuity spending.
Kallisio’s Stentra™ platform illustrates how patient-specific AM options might be built-in seamlessly into real-world scientific workflows. Utilizing a quick, normal intraoral optical scan, affected person anatomy is captured with minimal burden on employees. Design is automated, manufacturing validated, and a custom-made gadget might be delivered in as little as 72 hours.
As a result of every gadget is engineered to match a affected person’s distinctive anatomy and therapy plan, Stentra persistently immobilizes and displaces tissue throughout remedy periods. Printed scientific knowledge signifies this method can scale back the incidence of extreme oral mucositis by 77.6% (Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgical procedure). Stopping these extreme instances helps hospitals keep away from the cascading $17,000 per-patient price related to toxicity administration—demonstrating that modest upfront funding yields substantial downstream financial savings.
How can personalised units enhance operational velocity? By saving an estimated 3–4 hours of pricy machine time per affected person course.
Linear accelerators (LINAC) are among the many most capital-intensive property in oncology. Each minute of delay or rework erodes throughput. Generic immobilization units usually require repeated setup changes and repositioning, introducing unpredictability into tightly scheduled therapy slots.
Affected person-specific options reminiscent of Stentra match reliably and reproducibly, decreasing setup time and variability. Knowledge reveals that 3–7 minutes per fraction are saved through the use of Stentra [Kallisio Value Analysis]. Over a regular 30-fraction course for head and neck most cancers remedy, this accumulates to 3–4 hours of LINAC time saved per affected person. The ensuing effectivity releases capability to deal with extra sufferers with out including shifts or employees.
Equally, poor match with normal units contributes to simulation re-scan charges approaching 10%. Customized 3D-printed options scale back this to <1% [Kallisio Value Analysis], minimizing delays, affected person inconvenience, and pointless imaging prices.
Conclusion: The Enterprise Case for Customized 3D Printing in Oncology is Clear
- Medical Effectiveness
- Operational Effectivity
- Minimizing errors, interruptions, replanning and costly therapy time permits facilities to extend affected person quantity on current infrastructure.
As value-based care fashions proceed to penalize issues and reward effectivity, AM applied sciences like Stentra display that personalised medication is now not a luxurious, it’s the most fiscally accountable path ahead.
Kallisio is a Gold Sponsor for Additive Manufacturing Methods (AMS), a three-day trade occasion happening February 24–26 in New York Metropolis. The convention brings collectively trade leaders, policymakers, and innovators from throughout the worldwide AM ecosystem. Kallisio’s CEO Rajan Patel can even take part in a panel on “3D Printing for Oncology.” Registration is open through the AMS web site.
Subscribe to Our E-mail E-newsletter
Keep up-to-date on all the newest information from the 3D printing trade and obtain data and presents from third occasion distributors.



