Wednesday, February 11, 2026

Classes from 300+ palletizing tasks in 2025


After greater than 300 palletizing deployments in 2025—and over 900 Lean Palletizing models now operating in manufacturing—we noticed a transparent sample emerge.

The producers who succeeded didn’t have good information, limitless budgets, or robotics groups on standby. What that they had was readability: on their ache, their priorities, and their willingness to start out.

Right here’s what 2025 taught us about palletizing automation and what it means if you happen to’re contemplating your first transfer.

And if you happen to want watching over studying, you may get these insights together with video case research from SC Johnson, Coca-Cola, and Korea Filter Engineering in our webinar replay.

1. Labor challenges aren’t momentary. They’re structural.

By 2025, labor shortages stopped being a threat and have become an working situation.

Throughout meals, beverage, and shopper items, producers informed us the identical story:

  • Continual problem staffing palletizing position
  • Excessive turnover on repetitive end-of-line duties
  • Rising reliance on time beyond regulation or momentary labor

The lesson was blunt: cobot palletizing protects manufacturing continuity. It doesn’t clear up hiring—however it removes your most fragile dependency from the equation.

2. Security strikes tasks sooner than productiveness ever will

Many producers assume automation choices are pushed by throughput. In actuality, security unlocked approvals sooner than productiveness good points.

Tasks moved quickest when:

  • Ergonomic dangers have been clearly documented

  • HSE and HR have been concerned early

  • Palletizing was framed as a long-term security funding

In 2025, the quickest tasks didn’t begin with cycle occasions. They began with folks.

3. ROI works finest when it’s framed as price avoidance

Successful tasks didn’t “show ROI later.” They quantified it upfront.

Profitable groups got here ready with:

  • Labor price per shift
  • Annual price of staffing a palletizing station
  • Time beyond regulation, turnover, and injury-related prices

Tasks that stalled typically lacked a monetary baseline or a transparent proprietor. The takeaway: ROI framed as price avoidance succeeds, particularly with operations and finance stakeholders.

4. One line beats a factory-wide plan

Ambition killed extra tasks than finances.

Producers who succeeded began with:

  • One line
  • One product household
  • One clear drawback to unravel

They deployed, realized, stabilized—and solely then scaled. Ready for the “good” factory-wide resolution constantly delayed progress. In 2025, momentum beat perfection each time.

5. Possession issues greater than know-how

Some stalled tasks had the correct robotic, the correct utility, and the correct companion. What they didn’t have was possession.

Profitable palletizing tasks had:

  • A named sponsor
  • A transparent decision-maker
  • A timeline tied to actual operational stress

Automation handled as a “nice-to-have” not often moved ahead. Selections have to be owned to maneuver.

 

6. Most palletizing purposes are already cobot-ready

One of many greatest surprises from 2025: what number of producers already certified for cobot palletizing.

In case your utility appears like this:

  • Circumstances between 1–35 kg (1–77 lbs)
  • Commonplace pallets (48×40 or Euro)
  • Secure end-of-line circulate
  • Exhausting-to-staff palletizing position

You’re possible decrease threat than you assume. For a lot of crops, the barrier wasn’t feasibility—it was notion.

 

7. Finish-of-line is the place ache concentrates

Griffith Foods End-of-line

Palletizing constantly delivered the quickest reduction as a result of:

  • It’s hardest to workers
  • It carries excessive ergonomic threat
  • It’s remoted from upstream processes

In comparison with automating earlier manufacturing steps, end-of-line palletizing minimized disruption whereas delivering rapid operational influence.

 

8. Ready for development is a shedding technique

A standard hesitation we heard: “We’ll automate when volumes improve.”

In actuality, labor constraints hit earlier than development does. Producers who automated early used palletizing to:

  • Allow development
  • Soak up demand spikes
  • Keep away from future bottlenecks

Those that waited typically discovered themselves reacting below stress. In 2025, automation labored finest as a development enabler, not a final resort.

 

9. Flexibility beats peak pace

Producers routinely overestimated how briskly they wanted to palletize.

What really mattered:

  • Dependable uptime
  • Simple changeovers
  • Operators who felt assured operating the system

Peak pace seemed good on paper. Dependable flexibility gained on the ground.

10. Cobot palletizing works finest as an operational device

Probably the most profitable producers stopped treating palletizing as a one-off automation venture.

As a substitute, they handled cobots like:

  • Commonplace manufacturing gear
  • A security and workforce stability asset
  • A protracted-term a part of their working mannequin

When palletizing felt advanced and dangerous, adoption suffered. When it felt acquainted and usable, it caught.

Bonus classes that modified minds

Integration worry is larger than the true integration effort.
Most deployments occurred in 1–3 days, not weeks, with minimal upstream adjustments and lighter IT involvement than anticipated.

Downtime threat issues greater than capital price.
Executives targeted much less on CapEx and extra on missed shipments, time beyond regulation, and publicity when labor didn’t present up.

Ease of use determines long-term success.
Operators—not engineers—run palletizers day-after-day. Easy interfaces and quick coaching constantly outperformed superior options.

The widespread place to begin

Producers who moved ahead sometimes started with:

  • One line, one product household
  • A easy ROI estimate (labor + security)
  • A low-risk feasibility test
  • Clear possession and a timeline

The lesson from 2025 is evident: palletizing automation doesn’t have to be advanced to be efficient. It must be grounded in actual operational ache—and designed for the individuals who run it day-after-day.

 

Is Lean Palletizing the correct match to your manufacturing line?  

Not each line has the identical necessities. Payload, cycle time, SKU combine, and out there house all matter.

Use Robotiq’s Palletizing Match Instrument to shortly assess whether or not cobot palletizing is sensible to your operation and what a practical deployment might appear like to your facility.

Screenshot 2025-09-08 at 9.41.29 AM

 



Related Articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Articles

PHP Code Snippets Powered By : XYZScripts.com